Lamb leg strak vs Minted lamb kebabs
Overall, Lamb leg strak has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Lamb leg strak | Minted lamb kebabs |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | — |
| NOVA group | 1 | 4 |
| Calories | 155 kcal | 214 kcal |
| Fat | 8.4 g | 12.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.7 g | 6.2 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 1.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | — |
| Fiber | 0 g | 1.5 g |
| Protein | 19.8 g | 18.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Lamb leg strak has 27% fewer calories (155 kcal vs 214 kcal).
- Lamb leg strak has 32% less fat (8.4 g vs 12.4 g).
- Lamb leg strak has 41% less saturated fat (3.7 g vs 6.2 g).
- Lamb leg strak has no sugar, while Minted lamb kebabs has 1.5 g.
- Minted lamb kebabs has 100% more fiber (1.5 g vs 0 g).
- Lamb leg strak is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Lamb leg strak
lamb
Minted lamb kebabs
Water, dried potato, rice flour, sugar, mint, flavouring, parsley, salt, onion powder, yeast extract, paprika, garlic powder, sodium metabisulphite, spearmint oil.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Lamb leg strak or Minted lamb kebabs?
Overall, Lamb leg strak has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Lamb leg strak has fewer calories: 155 kcal versus 214 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Lamb leg strak has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.5 g per 100 g.