Lamb shanks vs Minted lamb kebabs
Overall, Lamb shanks has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Lamb shanks | Minted lamb kebabs |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 161 kcal | 214 kcal |
| Fat | 7.6 g | 12.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.9 g | 6.2 g |
| Sugars | 2.1 g | 1.5 g |
| Salt | 0.4 g | — |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | 1.5 g |
| Protein | 19.5 g | 18.7 g |
| Additives | 1 | 1 |
| Allergens | Gluten | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Lamb shanks has 25% fewer calories (161 kcal vs 214 kcal).
- Lamb shanks has 39% less fat (7.6 g vs 12.4 g).
- Lamb shanks has 53% less saturated fat (2.9 g vs 6.2 g).
- Minted lamb kebabs has 29% less sugar (1.5 g vs 2.1 g).
- Minted lamb kebabs has 66% more fiber (1.5 g vs 0.5 g).
- Only Lamb shanks lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Lamb shanks
Lamb Shank (81%), Lamb Gravy with Rosemary & Mint (19%) (Red Wine, Roast Lamb Stock (Water, Lamb Bone, Yeast Extract, Salt, Sugar), Red Wine Vinegar, Cider Vinegar, Onion, Water, Cornflour, Tomato Purée, Sugar, Dark Brown Sugar, Mint, Rosemary, Garlic Purée, Caramelised Sugar Syrup, Onion Powder, Salt, Vegetable Oil (Sunflower, Rapeseed), Maize Starch, Wheat Flour, Xanthan Gum, Black Pepper).
Minted lamb kebabs
Water, dried potato, rice flour, sugar, mint, flavouring, parsley, salt, onion powder, yeast extract, paprika, garlic powder, sodium metabisulphite, spearmint oil.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Lamb shanks or Minted lamb kebabs?
Overall, Lamb shanks has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Lamb shanks has fewer calories: 161 kcal versus 214 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Minted lamb kebabs has less sugar: 1.5 g versus 2.1 g per 100 g.