Wild Mackerel Skinless & Boneless Fillets In Extra Virgin Olive Oil vs Maquereaux à l'huile
Overall, Maquereaux à l'huile has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Wild Mackerel Skinless & Boneless Fillets In Extra Virgin Olive Oil
Maquereaux à l'huile
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Wild Mackerel Skinless & Bon... | Maquereaux à l'huile |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 212 kcal | 142 kcal |
| Fat | 12.9 g | 5.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.9 g | 1.7 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Salt | 0.9 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 24.7 g | 21.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Maquereaux à l'huile has 33% fewer calories (142 kcal vs 212 kcal).
- Maquereaux à l'huile has 56% less fat (5.7 g vs 12.9 g).
- Maquereaux à l'huile has 42% less saturated fat (1.7 g vs 2.9 g).
- Wild Mackerel Skinless & Boneless Fillets In Extra Virgin Olive Oil has 14% more protein (24.7 g vs 21.3 g).
- Maquereaux à l'huile has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Wild Mackerel Skinless & Boneless Fillets In Extra Virgin Olive Oil lists: Fish.
Ingredients
Wild Mackerel Skinless & Boneless Fillets In Extra Virgin Olive Oil
Mackerel, organic extra virgin olive oil, sea salt.
Maquereaux à l'huile
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Wild Mackerel Skinless & Boneless Fillets In Extra Virgin Olive Oil or Maquereaux à l'huile?
Overall, Maquereaux à l'huile has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Maquereaux à l'huile has fewer calories: 142 kcal versus 212 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Wild Mackerel Skinless & Boneless Fillets In Extra Virgin Olive Oil has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.2 g per 100 g.