Whole Grains Oatnut vs 1688 Steinofenbrot
Overall, 1688 Steinofenbrot has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Whole Grains Oatnut | 1688 Steinofenbrot |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | b |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 279 kcal | 220 kcal |
| Fat | 5.8 g | 1.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 7 g | 1.7 g |
| Salt | 0.9 g | 1 g |
| Fiber | 4.7 g | 5.2 g |
| Protein | 9.3 g | 7.1 g |
| Additives | 5 | 2 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Milk, Nuts, Soybeans | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- 1688 Steinofenbrot has 21% fewer calories (220 kcal vs 279 kcal).
- 1688 Steinofenbrot has 74% less fat (1.5 g vs 5.8 g).
- Whole Grains Oatnut has no saturated fat, while 1688 Steinofenbrot has 0.3 g.
- 1688 Steinofenbrot has 76% less sugar (1.7 g vs 7 g).
- 1688 Steinofenbrot has 11% more fiber (5.2 g vs 4.7 g).
- Whole Grains Oatnut has 24% more protein (9.3 g vs 7.1 g).
- 1688 Steinofenbrot has the better Nutri-Score.
- 1688 Steinofenbrot is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Whole Grains Oatnut lists: Milk, Nuts, Soybeans.
Ingredients
Whole Grains Oatnut
whole wheat flour, water, unbleached enriched wheat flour [flour, malted barley flour, reduced iron, niacin, thiamin mononitrate (vitamin b1), riboflavin (vitamin b2), folic acid], oats, sugar, wheat gluten, yeast, hazelnuts (filberts), soybean oil, salt, sunflower seeds, preservatives (calcium propionate, sorbic acid), monoglycerides, datem, grain vinegar, nuts (walnuts, almonds), soy, whey, soy lecithin, calcium sulfate,
1688 Steinofenbrot
farine de BLÉ, levain (eau, farine de SEIGLE compléte, farine de SEIGLE, farine de BLE), eau, farine de SEIGLE, sel, levure, farine de SEIGLE malté, correcteur d'acidité acétates de sodium, agent de traitement de la farine acide ascorbique.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Whole Grains Oatnut or 1688 Steinofenbrot?
Overall, 1688 Steinofenbrot has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
1688 Steinofenbrot has fewer calories: 220 kcal versus 279 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
1688 Steinofenbrot has less sugar: 1.7 g versus 7 g per 100 g.