Comparison

White Miso vs Miso Easy (Traditional)

Overall, Miso Easy (Traditional) has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientWhite MisoMiso Easy (Traditional)
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 163 kcal 100 kcal
Fat 6.4 g 3.3 g
Saturated fat 1.1 g 0.5 g
Sugars 7.7 g 5.2 g
Salt 11.8 g 8.6 g
Fiber 4.4 g 0 g
Protein 12 g 8.1 g
Additives01
AllergensSoybeansSoybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Miso Easy (Traditional) has 39% fewer calories (100 kcal vs 163 kcal).
  • Miso Easy (Traditional) has 48% less fat (3.3 g vs 6.4 g).
  • Miso Easy (Traditional) has 56% less saturated fat (0.5 g vs 1.1 g).
  • Miso Easy (Traditional) has 32% less sugar (5.2 g vs 7.7 g).
  • Miso Easy (Traditional) has 27% less salt (8.6 g vs 11.8 g).
  • White Miso has 100% more fiber (4.4 g vs 0 g).
  • White Miso has 33% more protein (12 g vs 8.1 g).
  • White Miso is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

White Miso

water, soybeans 35%, rice, salt.

Miso Easy (Traditional)

soybean paste (water, soya bean, rice, salt), water, alcohol, yeast extract powder, salt, sugar, seasoned kelp extract (kelp, salt, dextrin)

FAQ

Which is healthier: White Miso or Miso Easy (Traditional)?

Overall, Miso Easy (Traditional) has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Miso Easy (Traditional) has fewer calories: 100 kcal versus 163 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Miso Easy (Traditional) has less sugar: 5.2 g versus 7.7 g per 100 g.

More comparisons