Pâta miso vs Miso Easy (Traditional)
Overall, Pâta miso has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pâta miso | Miso Easy (Traditional) |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 132 kcal | 100 kcal |
| Fat | 4.7 g | 3.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.6 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 5.5 g | 5.2 g |
| Salt | 8.6 g | 8.6 g |
| Fiber | 5.7 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 11 g | 8.1 g |
| Additives | 2 | 1 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Soybeans | Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Miso Easy (Traditional) has 24% fewer calories (100 kcal vs 132 kcal).
- Miso Easy (Traditional) has 29% less fat (3.3 g vs 4.7 g).
- Pâta miso has 100% more fiber (5.7 g vs 0 g).
- Pâta miso has 26% more protein (11 g vs 8.1 g).
- Pâta miso has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Pâta miso lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Pâta miso
Pâte de soja et de riz (eau, fèves de soja, riz, sel), eau, pâte de soja et d'orge (fèves de soja, eau, sel, farine d'orge rôti), alcool, sel, exhausteurs de goût: inosinate disodique, 5-ribonucléotide disodique, extrait de levure.
Miso Easy (Traditional)
soybean paste (water, soya bean, rice, salt), water, alcohol, yeast extract powder, salt, sugar, seasoned kelp extract (kelp, salt, dextrin)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pâta miso or Miso Easy (Traditional)?
Overall, Pâta miso has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Miso Easy (Traditional) has fewer calories: 100 kcal versus 132 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Miso Easy (Traditional) has less sugar: 5.2 g versus 5.5 g per 100 g.