Wafer thin cooked ham slices vs Finely Sliced Roast Ham
Overall, Wafer thin cooked ham slices has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Wafer thin cooked ham slices | Finely Sliced Roast Ham |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 110 kcal | 141 kcal |
| Fat | 3.4 g | 6.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.3 g | 2.1 g |
| Sugars | 0.8 g | 1 g |
| Salt | 1.5 g | 1.5 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 18.5 g | 19.9 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | Pork | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Wafer thin cooked ham slices has 22% fewer calories (110 kcal vs 141 kcal).
- Wafer thin cooked ham slices has 46% less fat (3.4 g vs 6.3 g).
- Wafer thin cooked ham slices has 38% less saturated fat (1.3 g vs 2.1 g).
- Only Wafer thin cooked ham slices lists: Pork.
Ingredients
Wafer thin cooked ham slices
pork, salt, sugar, triphosphates, sodium ascorbate, sodium nitrate
Finely Sliced Roast Ham
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Wafer thin cooked ham slices or Finely Sliced Roast Ham?
Overall, Wafer thin cooked ham slices has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Wafer thin cooked ham slices has fewer calories: 110 kcal versus 141 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Wafer thin cooked ham slices has less sugar: 0.8 g versus 1 g per 100 g.