Comparison

Wafer thin cooked ham slices vs Dry cure ham

Overall, Wafer thin cooked ham slices has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 4.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientWafer thin cooked ham slicesDry cure ham
Nutri-Score c d
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 110 kcal 125 kcal
Fat 3.4 g 2.7 g
Saturated fat 1.3 g 0.9 g
Sugars 0.8 g 1.5 g
Salt 1.5 g 2.3 g
Fiber 0.5 g 0 g
Protein 18.5 g 24.6 g
Additives21
AllergensPorkPork

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Wafer thin cooked ham slices has 12% fewer calories (110 kcal vs 125 kcal).
  • Dry cure ham has 21% less fat (2.7 g vs 3.4 g).
  • Dry cure ham has 32% less saturated fat (0.9 g vs 1.3 g).
  • Wafer thin cooked ham slices has 47% less sugar (0.8 g vs 1.5 g).
  • Wafer thin cooked ham slices has 36% less salt (1.5 g vs 2.3 g).
  • Wafer thin cooked ham slices has 100% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0 g).
  • Dry cure ham has 25% more protein (24.6 g vs 18.5 g).
  • Wafer thin cooked ham slices has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Dry cure ham is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Wafer thin cooked ham slices

pork, salt, sugar, triphosphates, sodium ascorbate, sodium nitrate

Dry cure ham

pork, salt, demerara sugar, sodium ascorbate, sodium nitrite

FAQ

Which is healthier: Wafer thin cooked ham slices or Dry cure ham?

Overall, Wafer thin cooked ham slices has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Wafer thin cooked ham slices has fewer calories: 110 kcal versus 125 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Wafer thin cooked ham slices has less sugar: 0.8 g versus 1.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons