Vpd filet sole map (4pc) vs Filets de sole tropicale
Overall, Vpd filet sole map (4pc) has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Vpd filet sole map (4pc) | Filets de sole tropicale |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 75 kcal | 69 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.3 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.4 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | — |
| Protein | 18 g | 16 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Vpd filet sole map (4pc) has 11% more protein (18 g vs 16 g).
Ingredients
Vpd filet sole map (4pc)
Sole nettoyée
Filets de sole tropicale
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Vpd filet sole map (4pc) or Filets de sole tropicale?
Overall, Vpd filet sole map (4pc) has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Filets de sole tropicale has fewer calories: 69 kcal versus 75 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Filets de sole tropicale has less sugar: 0.3 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.