Tuna Fillets in brine vs Thon au chili
Overall, Tuna Fillets in brine has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Tuna Fillets in brine | Thon au chili |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | c |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 106 kcal | 102 kcal |
| Fat | 0.8 g | 4 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 0.4 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 3.5 g |
| Salt | 1.1 g | 1.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.2 g |
| Protein | 24.8 g | 11 g |
| Additives | 0 | 3 |
| Allergens | None listed | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Tuna Fillets in brine has 80% less fat (0.8 g vs 4 g).
- Tuna Fillets in brine has no sugar, while Thon au chili has 3.5 g.
- Tuna Fillets in brine has 56% more protein (24.8 g vs 11 g).
- Tuna Fillets in brine has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Thon au chili lists: Fish.
Ingredients
Tuna Fillets in brine
Not available.
Thon au chili
Thon (49%), eau, sucre, huile de tournesol, concentré de tomates, chili (3%), amidon de tapioca modifié, sel, épaissisant: gomme guar, poivron en poudre (0,5%), exhausteur de goût: glutamate monosodique, ail en poudre, vinaigre de riz, colorant: extrait de paprika,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Tuna Fillets in brine or Thon au chili?
Overall, Tuna Fillets in brine has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Thon au chili has fewer calories: 102 kcal versus 106 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Tuna Fillets in brine has less sugar: 0 g versus 3.5 g per 100 g.