Posta de atum dos Açores vs Tuna Fillets in brine
Overall, Tuna Fillets in brine has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Posta de atum dos Açores | Tuna Fillets in brine |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 283 kcal | 106 kcal |
| Fat | 22.5 g | 0.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.8 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1.3 g | 1.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 19.5 g | 24.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Tuna Fillets in brine has 63% fewer calories (106 kcal vs 283 kcal).
- Tuna Fillets in brine has 96% less fat (0.8 g vs 22.5 g).
- Tuna Fillets in brine has 92% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 3.8 g).
- Tuna Fillets in brine has no sugar, while Posta de atum dos Açores has 0.5 g.
- Tuna Fillets in brine has 21% more protein (24.8 g vs 19.5 g).
- Tuna Fillets in brine has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Posta de atum dos Açores lists: Fish.
Ingredients
Posta de atum dos Açores
Atum, azeite e sal
Tuna Fillets in brine
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Posta de atum dos Açores or Tuna Fillets in brine?
Overall, Tuna Fillets in brine has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Tuna Fillets in brine has fewer calories: 106 kcal versus 283 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Tuna Fillets in brine has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.