Comparison

Posta de atum dos Açores vs Tuna Fillets in brine

Overall, Tuna Fillets in brine has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPosta de atum dos AçoresTuna Fillets in brine
Nutri-Score d a
NOVA group 3 —
Calories 283 kcal 106 kcal
Fat 22.5 g 0.8 g
Saturated fat 3.8 g 0.3 g
Sugars 0.5 g 0 g
Salt 1.3 g 1.1 g
Fiber 0 g —
Protein 19.5 g 24.8 g
Additives00
AllergensFishNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Tuna Fillets in brine has 63% fewer calories (106 kcal vs 283 kcal).
  • Tuna Fillets in brine has 96% less fat (0.8 g vs 22.5 g).
  • Tuna Fillets in brine has 92% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 3.8 g).
  • Tuna Fillets in brine has no sugar, while Posta de atum dos Açores has 0.5 g.
  • Tuna Fillets in brine has 21% more protein (24.8 g vs 19.5 g).
  • Tuna Fillets in brine has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Posta de atum dos Açores lists: Fish.

Ingredients

Posta de atum dos Açores

Atum, azeite e sal

Tuna Fillets in brine

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Posta de atum dos Açores or Tuna Fillets in brine?

Overall, Tuna Fillets in brine has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Tuna Fillets in brine has fewer calories: 106 kcal versus 283 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Tuna Fillets in brine has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons