Comparison

The Original San Francisco Sourdough vs Rye Sourdough Bloomer

Overall, The Original San Francisco Sourdough has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientThe Original San Francisco S...Rye Sourdough Bloomer
Nutri-Score c —
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 256 kcal 232 kcal
Fat 0 g 1.2 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0.4 g
Sugars 0 g 1.8 g
Salt 1.5 g —
Fiber 0 g 6.4 g
Protein 9.3 g 8.8 g
Additives00
AllergensEggs, Gluten, Milk, Sesame seedsGluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • The Original San Francisco Sourdough has no fat, while Rye Sourdough Bloomer has 1.2 g.
  • The Original San Francisco Sourdough has no saturated fat, while Rye Sourdough Bloomer has 0.4 g.
  • The Original San Francisco Sourdough has no sugar, while Rye Sourdough Bloomer has 1.8 g.
  • Rye Sourdough Bloomer has 100% more fiber (6.4 g vs 0 g).
  • Only The Original San Francisco Sourdough lists: Eggs, Milk, Sesame seeds.

Ingredients

The Original San Francisco Sourdough

ORGANIC WHEAT FLOUR, WATER, SEA SALT, ORGANIC WHEAT GLUTEN, ENZYMES. CONTAINS: WHEAT MANUFACTURED IN A FACILITY THAT ALSO HANDLES SOY, MILK, EGGS AND SESAME.

Rye Sourdough Bloomer

Wheat Flour (Wheat Flour, Calcium Carbonate, Iron, Niacin, Thiamin], Water, Rye Flour (7%), Wheat Fibre, Salt, Rice Flour. Malted Barley Flour, Rapeseed Oil, Barley Malt Extract.

FAQ

Which is healthier: The Original San Francisco Sourdough or Rye Sourdough Bloomer?

Overall, The Original San Francisco Sourdough has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Rye Sourdough Bloomer has fewer calories: 232 kcal versus 256 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

The Original San Francisco Sourdough has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons