Tempeh Milde Hilde vs Kimchi
Overall, Tempeh Milde Hilde has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Tempeh Milde Hilde | Kimchi |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 120 kcal | 26 kcal |
| Fat | 3.6 g | 0.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 1.1 g | 2.7 g |
| Salt | 1.3 g | 4.8 g |
| Fiber | 10 g | 1.5 g |
| Protein | 15.5 g | 1.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Lupin | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kimchi has 78% fewer calories (26 kcal vs 120 kcal).
- Kimchi has 90% less fat (0.4 g vs 3.6 g).
- Kimchi has 90% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Tempeh Milde Hilde has 59% less sugar (1.1 g vs 2.7 g).
- Tempeh Milde Hilde has 73% less salt (1.3 g vs 4.8 g).
- Tempeh Milde Hilde has 85% more fiber (10 g vs 1.5 g).
- Tempeh Milde Hilde has 91% more protein (15.5 g vs 1.5 g).
- Tempeh Milde Hilde has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Tempeh Milde Hilde lists: Lupin.
- Only Kimchi lists: Fish.
Ingredients
Tempeh Milde Hilde
Lupinen* gekocht 85%, Wasser, Apfelessig*, Meersalz, Gewürze 0,9% (Melde*, Fenchel*, Quendel*, Salbei*, Muskatnuss*, Petersilie*, Knoblauch*, Pfeffer*, Galgant*), Starterkulturen (Rhizopus) *aus bio logischemAnbau
Kimchi
Chinese Cabbage (pak-choil, Daikon Radish, Carrots, Spring Onions, Sea Salt, FISH SAUCÉ (Filtered Water, Sugar, Anchovy Extract), Garlic, Chili Powder, Ginger, Cayenne Pepper.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Tempeh Milde Hilde or Kimchi?
Overall, Tempeh Milde Hilde has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kimchi has fewer calories: 26 kcal versus 120 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Tempeh Milde Hilde has less sugar: 1.1 g versus 2.7 g per 100 g.