Comparison
Tarama salad vs Kritsinia sotou
Overall, Kritsinia sotou has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Tarama salad | Kritsinia sotou |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 501 kcal | 463 kcal |
| Fat | 52 g | 18 g |
| Saturated fat | 7.9 g | 5.8 g |
| Sugars | 1.6 g | 12 g |
| Salt | 3.5 g | 1.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 3.3 g |
| Protein | 2.3 g | 13 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kritsinia sotou has 65% less fat (18 g vs 52 g).
- Kritsinia sotou has 27% less saturated fat (5.8 g vs 7.9 g).
- Tarama salad has 87% less sugar (1.6 g vs 12 g).
- Kritsinia sotou has 68% less salt (1.1 g vs 3.5 g).
- Kritsinia sotou has 82% more protein (13 g vs 2.3 g).
- Kritsinia sotou has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Tarama salad
Not available.
Kritsinia sotou
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Tarama salad or Kritsinia sotou?
Overall, Kritsinia sotou has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kritsinia sotou has fewer calories: 463 kcal versus 501 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Tarama salad has less sugar: 1.6 g versus 12 g per 100 g.