Comparison
Frooty rings vs Kritsinia sotou
Overall, Frooty rings has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Frooty rings | Kritsinia sotou |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 380 kcal | 463 kcal |
| Fat | 2 g | 18 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 5.8 g |
| Sugars | 25 g | 12 g |
| Salt | 0.5 g | 1.1 g |
| Fiber | 40 g | 3.3 g |
| Protein | 9 g | 13 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Frooty rings has 18% fewer calories (380 kcal vs 463 kcal).
- Frooty rings has 89% less fat (2 g vs 18 g).
- Frooty rings has 95% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 5.8 g).
- Kritsinia sotou has 52% less sugar (12 g vs 25 g).
- Frooty rings has 55% less salt (0.5 g vs 1.1 g).
- Frooty rings has 92% more fiber (40 g vs 3.3 g).
- Kritsinia sotou has 31% more protein (13 g vs 9 g).
- Frooty rings has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Frooty rings
Not available.
Kritsinia sotou
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Frooty rings or Kritsinia sotou?
Overall, Frooty rings has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Frooty rings has fewer calories: 380 kcal versus 463 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kritsinia sotou has less sugar: 12 g versus 25 g per 100 g.