Comparison
Nuts & Fruit vs Frooty rings
Overall, Frooty rings has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Nuts & Fruit | Frooty rings |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 513 kcal | 380 kcal |
| Fat | 31.9 g | 2 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.8 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 31.1 g | 25 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Fiber | 6.7 g | 40 g |
| Protein | 16.5 g | 9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Frooty rings has 26% fewer calories (380 kcal vs 513 kcal).
- Frooty rings has 94% less fat (2 g vs 31.9 g).
- Frooty rings has 92% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 3.8 g).
- Frooty rings has 20% less sugar (25 g vs 31.1 g).
- Nuts & Fruit has 94% less salt (0 g vs 0.5 g).
- Frooty rings has 83% more fiber (40 g vs 6.7 g).
- Nuts & Fruit has 45% more protein (16.5 g vs 9 g).
- Frooty rings has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Nuts & Fruit
Not available.
Frooty rings
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Nuts & Fruit or Frooty rings?
Overall, Frooty rings has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Frooty rings has fewer calories: 380 kcal versus 513 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Frooty rings has less sugar: 25 g versus 31.1 g per 100 g.