Comparison
Hemo vs Frooty rings
Overall, Frooty rings has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Hemo | Frooty rings |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | c |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 375 kcal | 380 kcal |
| Fat | 3.2 g | 2 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.2 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 69 g | 25 g |
| Salt | 0.4 g | 0.5 g |
| Fiber | — | 40 g |
| Protein | 3.9 g | 9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Frooty rings has 38% less fat (2 g vs 3.2 g).
- Frooty rings has 75% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 1.2 g).
- Frooty rings has 64% less sugar (25 g vs 69 g).
- Frooty rings has 57% more protein (9 g vs 3.9 g).
- Frooty rings has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Hemo
Not available.
Frooty rings
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Hemo or Frooty rings?
Overall, Frooty rings has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Hemo has fewer calories: 375 kcal versus 380 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Frooty rings has less sugar: 25 g versus 69 g per 100 g.