Comparison
Nuts & Fruit vs Kritsinia sotou
Overall, Nuts & Fruit has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Nuts & Fruit | Kritsinia sotou |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 513 kcal | 463 kcal |
| Fat | 31.9 g | 18 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.8 g | 5.8 g |
| Sugars | 31.1 g | 12 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 1.1 g |
| Fiber | 6.7 g | 3.3 g |
| Protein | 16.5 g | 13 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kritsinia sotou has 44% less fat (18 g vs 31.9 g).
- Nuts & Fruit has 34% less saturated fat (3.8 g vs 5.8 g).
- Kritsinia sotou has 61% less sugar (12 g vs 31.1 g).
- Nuts & Fruit has 97% less salt (0 g vs 1.1 g).
- Nuts & Fruit has 51% more fiber (6.7 g vs 3.3 g).
- Nuts & Fruit has 21% more protein (16.5 g vs 13 g).
Ingredients
Nuts & Fruit
Not available.
Kritsinia sotou
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Nuts & Fruit or Kritsinia sotou?
Overall, Nuts & Fruit has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kritsinia sotou has fewer calories: 463 kcal versus 513 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kritsinia sotou has less sugar: 12 g versus 31.1 g per 100 g.