Comparison
Tarama salad vs Frooty rings
Overall, Frooty rings has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Tarama salad | Frooty rings |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | c |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 501 kcal | 380 kcal |
| Fat | 52 g | 2 g |
| Saturated fat | 7.9 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 1.6 g | 25 g |
| Salt | 3.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Fiber | — | 40 g |
| Protein | 2.3 g | 9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Frooty rings has 24% fewer calories (380 kcal vs 501 kcal).
- Frooty rings has 96% less fat (2 g vs 52 g).
- Frooty rings has 96% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 7.9 g).
- Tarama salad has 94% less sugar (1.6 g vs 25 g).
- Frooty rings has 86% less salt (0.5 g vs 3.5 g).
- Frooty rings has 74% more protein (9 g vs 2.3 g).
- Frooty rings has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Tarama salad
Not available.
Frooty rings
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Tarama salad or Frooty rings?
Overall, Frooty rings has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Frooty rings has fewer calories: 380 kcal versus 501 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Tarama salad has less sugar: 1.6 g versus 25 g per 100 g.