Comparison
Frooty rings vs Ariani
Overall, Ariani has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Frooty rings | Ariani |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 380 kcal | 40 kcal |
| Fat | 2 g | 1.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 0.7 g |
| Sugars | 25 g | 3.5 g |
| Salt | 0.5 g | 0.6 g |
| Fiber | 40 g | — |
| Protein | 9 g | 3.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Ariani has 89% fewer calories (40 kcal vs 380 kcal).
- Ariani has 25% less fat (1.5 g vs 2 g).
- Frooty rings has 57% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 0.7 g).
- Ariani has 86% less sugar (3.5 g vs 25 g).
- Frooty rings has 64% more protein (9 g vs 3.2 g).
Ingredients
Frooty rings
Not available.
Ariani
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Frooty rings or Ariani?
Overall, Ariani has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Ariani has fewer calories: 40 kcal versus 380 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Ariani has less sugar: 3.5 g versus 25 g per 100 g.