Comparison
Ariani vs Kritsinia sotou
Overall, Ariani has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Ariani | Kritsinia sotou |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 40 kcal | 463 kcal |
| Fat | 1.5 g | 18 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.7 g | 5.8 g |
| Sugars | 3.5 g | 12 g |
| Salt | 0.6 g | 1.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 3.3 g |
| Protein | 3.2 g | 13 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Ariani has 91% fewer calories (40 kcal vs 463 kcal).
- Ariani has 92% less fat (1.5 g vs 18 g).
- Ariani has 88% less saturated fat (0.7 g vs 5.8 g).
- Ariani has 71% less sugar (3.5 g vs 12 g).
- Ariani has 44% less salt (0.6 g vs 1.1 g).
- Kritsinia sotou has 75% more protein (13 g vs 3.2 g).
- Ariani has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Ariani
Not available.
Kritsinia sotou
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Ariani or Kritsinia sotou?
Overall, Ariani has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Ariani has fewer calories: 40 kcal versus 463 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Ariani has less sugar: 3.5 g versus 12 g per 100 g.