Sweet cured hot smoked mackerel vs Filetes de caballa aceite girasol
Overall, Filetes de caballa aceite girasol has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sweet cured hot smoked macke... | Filetes de caballa aceite gi... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | c |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 346 kcal | 191 kcal |
| Fat | 26.8 g | 10.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 5.8 g | 2 g |
| Sugars | 3.9 g | 0 g |
| Salt | — | 1.5 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | — |
| Protein | 20.9 g | 24.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Filetes de caballa aceite girasol has 45% fewer calories (191 kcal vs 346 kcal).
- Filetes de caballa aceite girasol has 61% less fat (10.5 g vs 26.8 g).
- Filetes de caballa aceite girasol has 66% less saturated fat (2 g vs 5.8 g).
- Filetes de caballa aceite girasol has no sugar, while Sweet cured hot smoked mackerel has 3.9 g.
- Filetes de caballa aceite girasol has 13% more protein (24.1 g vs 20.9 g).
- Only Sweet cured hot smoked mackerel lists: Fish.
Ingredients
Sweet cured hot smoked mackerel
Mackerel (Fish) (96%) · Demerara Sugar Muscovado Sugar Blackthorn Scottish Sea Salt Salt
Filetes de caballa aceite girasol
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sweet cured hot smoked mackerel or Filetes de caballa aceite girasol?
Overall, Filetes de caballa aceite girasol has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Filetes de caballa aceite girasol has fewer calories: 191 kcal versus 346 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Filetes de caballa aceite girasol has less sugar: 0 g versus 3.9 g per 100 g.