Comparison
Steak d'espadon decongelé vs Trance di pesce spada
Overall, Trance di pesce spada has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Steak d'espadon decongelé | Trance di pesce spada |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 135 kcal | 93 kcal |
| Fat | 6.8 g | 2 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.8 g | 0.6 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0.7 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 18 g | 19 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Trance di pesce spada has 31% fewer calories (93 kcal vs 135 kcal).
- Trance di pesce spada has 71% less fat (2 g vs 6.8 g).
- Trance di pesce spada has 67% less saturated fat (0.6 g vs 1.8 g).
- Trance di pesce spada has 74% less salt (0.2 g vs 0.7 g).
- Only Trance di pesce spada lists: Fish.
Ingredients
Steak d'espadon decongelé
Not available.
Trance di pesce spada
Xiphias gladius.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Steak d'espadon decongelé or Trance di pesce spada?
Overall, Trance di pesce spada has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Trance di pesce spada has fewer calories: 93 kcal versus 135 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Steak d'espadon decongelé has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Steak d'espadon decongel... vs Espadon fumé
Espadon fumé vs Trance di pesce spada
Steak d'espadon decongel... vs Pavé ESPADON
Steak d'espadon decongel... vs Espadon sauvage fumé
Steak d'espadon decongel... vs Émincés d'espadon fumé
Steak d'espadon decongel... vs Tocchetti di pesce spada...
Steak d'espadon decongel... vs Espadon Fumé Tranché
Pavé ESPADON vs Trance di pesce spada