Sonnenblumenkerne vs Frutos secos
Overall, Frutos secos has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sonnenblumenkerne | Frutos secos |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 660 kcal | 622 kcal |
| Fat | 62 g | 54 g |
| Saturated fat | 7.1 g | 6.4 g |
| Sugars | 2.6 g | 2.2 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Fiber | — | 9.7 g |
| Protein | 20 g | 24 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Frutos secos has 13% less fat (54 g vs 62 g).
- Frutos secos has 15% less sugar (2.2 g vs 2.6 g).
- Sonnenblumenkerne has 98% less salt (0 g vs 0.5 g).
- Frutos secos has 17% more protein (24 g vs 20 g).
- Frutos secos has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Sonnenblumenkerne
Bio Sonnenblumenkerne*, geschält *Aus kontrolliert biologischer Landwirtschaft.
Frutos secos
INFORMACIÓN NUTRICIONAL Flores medios por porción** 25g * 642 kJ/ Valor energético
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sonnenblumenkerne or Frutos secos?
Overall, Frutos secos has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Frutos secos has fewer calories: 622 kcal versus 660 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Frutos secos has less sugar: 2.2 g versus 2.6 g per 100 g.