Sarrasin vs Wheat bisk
Overall, Sarrasin has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sarrasin | Wheat bisk |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | 1 | 3 |
| Calories | 340 kcal | 134 kcal |
| Fat | 2.6 g | 0.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 1.5 g | 1.7 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 7.2 g | 3.8 g |
| Protein | 10.3 g | 4.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Mustard | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Wheat bisk has 61% fewer calories (134 kcal vs 340 kcal).
- Wheat bisk has 69% less fat (0.8 g vs 2.6 g).
- Wheat bisk has 60% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 0.5 g).
- Sarrasin has 47% more fiber (7.2 g vs 3.8 g).
- Sarrasin has 56% more protein (10.3 g vs 4.5 g).
- Sarrasin has the better Nutri-Score.
- Sarrasin is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Sarrasin lists: Mustard.
Ingredients
Sarrasin
Sarrasin décortiqué*. *Produit issu de l'agriculture biologique.
Wheat bisk
WHOLE _WHEAT_ (95%), _Barley_ Malt Extract, Sugar, Salt, Niacin, Iron, Riboflavin, Thiamin, Folic Acid
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sarrasin or Wheat bisk?
Overall, Sarrasin has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Wheat bisk has fewer calories: 134 kcal versus 340 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sarrasin has less sugar: 1.5 g versus 1.7 g per 100 g.