Céréales gourmandes vs Wheat bisk
Overall, Céréales gourmandes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 4.
Céréales gourmandes
Wheat bisk
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Céréales gourmandes | Wheat bisk |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | 1 | 3 |
| Calories | 374 kcal | 134 kcal |
| Fat | 6.6 g | 0.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 1 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 3.2 g | 1.7 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 7.8 g | 3.8 g |
| Protein | 19.4 g | 4.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Soybeans | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Wheat bisk has 64% fewer calories (134 kcal vs 374 kcal).
- Wheat bisk has 88% less fat (0.8 g vs 6.6 g).
- Wheat bisk has 80% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 1 g).
- Wheat bisk has 47% less sugar (1.7 g vs 3.2 g).
- Céréales gourmandes has 51% more fiber (7.8 g vs 3.8 g).
- Céréales gourmandes has 77% more protein (19.4 g vs 4.5 g).
- Céréales gourmandes has the better Nutri-Score.
- Céréales gourmandes is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Céréales gourmandes lists: Soybeans.
Ingredients
Céréales gourmandes
Semoule de _blé_ dur précuite (56,5%). flocons de _soja_ précuits (25% ). semoule de maïs précuite (13%), farine de _blé_, flocons d'_orge_ précuits.
Wheat bisk
WHOLE _WHEAT_ (95%), _Barley_ Malt Extract, Sugar, Salt, Niacin, Iron, Riboflavin, Thiamin, Folic Acid
FAQ
Which is healthier: Céréales gourmandes or Wheat bisk?
Overall, Céréales gourmandes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Wheat bisk has fewer calories: 134 kcal versus 374 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Wheat bisk has less sugar: 1.7 g versus 3.2 g per 100 g.