Comparison

Céréales gourmandes vs Duo de céréales quinoa et boulgour 400g

Overall, Duo de céréales quinoa et boulgour 400g has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCéréales gourmandesDuo de céréales quinoa et bo...
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group 1 1
Calories 374 kcal 347 kcal
Fat 6.6 g 3.3 g
Saturated fat 1 g 0.4 g
Sugars 3.2 g 6.3 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 7.8 g 10 g
Protein 19.4 g 13 g
Additives00
AllergensGluten, SoybeansGluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Duo de céréales quinoa et boulgour 400g has 50% less fat (3.3 g vs 6.6 g).
  • Duo de céréales quinoa et boulgour 400g has 60% less saturated fat (0.4 g vs 1 g).
  • Céréales gourmandes has 49% less sugar (3.2 g vs 6.3 g).
  • Duo de céréales quinoa et boulgour 400g has 22% more fiber (10 g vs 7.8 g).
  • Céréales gourmandes has 33% more protein (19.4 g vs 13 g).
  • Only Céréales gourmandes lists: Soybeans.

Ingredients

Céréales gourmandes

Semoule de _blé_ dur précuite (56,5%). flocons de _soja_ précuits (25% ). semoule de maïs précuite (13%), farine de _blé_, flocons d'_orge_ précuits.

Duo de céréales quinoa et boulgour 400g

Quinoa 53% (quinoa blanc 35%, quinoa rouge 18%), BLE dur concasse precuit 47%. traces eventuelles de soja

FAQ

Which is healthier: Céréales gourmandes or Duo de céréales quinoa et boulgour 400g?

Overall, Duo de céréales quinoa et boulgour 400g has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Duo de céréales quinoa et boulgour 400g has fewer calories: 347 kcal versus 374 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Céréales gourmandes has less sugar: 3.2 g versus 6.3 g per 100 g.

More comparisons