Céréales gourmandes vs Sarrasin
Overall, Sarrasin has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Céréales gourmandes | Sarrasin |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 374 kcal | 340 kcal |
| Fat | 6.6 g | 2.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 1 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 3.2 g | 1.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 7.8 g | 7.2 g |
| Protein | 19.4 g | 10.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Soybeans | Gluten, Mustard |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sarrasin has 61% less fat (2.6 g vs 6.6 g).
- Sarrasin has 50% less saturated fat (0.5 g vs 1 g).
- Sarrasin has 53% less sugar (1.5 g vs 3.2 g).
- Céréales gourmandes has 47% more protein (19.4 g vs 10.3 g).
- Only Céréales gourmandes lists: Soybeans.
- Only Sarrasin lists: Mustard.
Ingredients
Céréales gourmandes
Semoule de _blé_ dur précuite (56,5%). flocons de _soja_ précuits (25% ). semoule de maïs précuite (13%), farine de _blé_, flocons d'_orge_ précuits.
Sarrasin
Sarrasin décortiqué*. *Produit issu de l'agriculture biologique.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Céréales gourmandes or Sarrasin?
Overall, Sarrasin has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sarrasin has fewer calories: 340 kcal versus 374 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sarrasin has less sugar: 1.5 g versus 3.2 g per 100 g.