Duo de céréales quinoa et boulgour 400g vs Wheat bisk
Overall, Duo de céréales quinoa et boulgour 400g has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.
Duo de céréales quinoa et boulgour 400g
Wheat bisk
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Duo de céréales quinoa et bo... | Wheat bisk |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | 1 | 3 |
| Calories | 347 kcal | 134 kcal |
| Fat | 3.3 g | 0.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.4 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 6.3 g | 1.7 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 10 g | 3.8 g |
| Protein | 13 g | 4.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Wheat bisk has 61% fewer calories (134 kcal vs 347 kcal).
- Wheat bisk has 76% less fat (0.8 g vs 3.3 g).
- Wheat bisk has 73% less sugar (1.7 g vs 6.3 g).
- Duo de céréales quinoa et boulgour 400g has 62% more fiber (10 g vs 3.8 g).
- Duo de céréales quinoa et boulgour 400g has 65% more protein (13 g vs 4.5 g).
- Duo de céréales quinoa et boulgour 400g has the better Nutri-Score.
- Duo de céréales quinoa et boulgour 400g is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Duo de céréales quinoa et boulgour 400g
Quinoa 53% (quinoa blanc 35%, quinoa rouge 18%), BLE dur concasse precuit 47%. traces eventuelles de soja
Wheat bisk
WHOLE _WHEAT_ (95%), _Barley_ Malt Extract, Sugar, Salt, Niacin, Iron, Riboflavin, Thiamin, Folic Acid
FAQ
Which is healthier: Duo de céréales quinoa et boulgour 400g or Wheat bisk?
Overall, Duo de céréales quinoa et boulgour 400g has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Wheat bisk has fewer calories: 134 kcal versus 347 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Wheat bisk has less sugar: 1.7 g versus 6.3 g per 100 g.