Romaine Hearts vs Couscous Salat
Overall, Romaine Hearts has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Romaine Hearts | Couscous Salat |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | d |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 11 kcal | 339 kcal |
| Fat | 0.1 g | 2.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 1.4 g | 4 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 2.5 g |
| Fiber | 1.3 g | 11 g |
| Protein | 1.2 g | 20 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Romaine Hearts has 97% fewer calories (11 kcal vs 339 kcal).
- Romaine Hearts has 95% less fat (0.1 g vs 2.2 g).
- Romaine Hearts has 80% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Romaine Hearts has 65% less sugar (1.4 g vs 4 g).
- Romaine Hearts has 99% less salt (0 g vs 2.5 g).
- Couscous Salat has 88% more fiber (11 g vs 1.3 g).
- Couscous Salat has 94% more protein (20 g vs 1.2 g).
- Romaine Hearts has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Couscous Salat lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Romaine Hearts
Sałata
Couscous Salat
Erbsen-Couscous (Erbsen - Nährwerte pro 1 Trockenproc Energie 1432 339 Fett 2 0 4. 2 2 mehl*) 38%, Vollkorn-Couscous (Vollkorn-Hartweizengrieß) 31%, -
FAQ
Which is healthier: Romaine Hearts or Couscous Salat?
Overall, Romaine Hearts has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Romaine Hearts has fewer calories: 11 kcal versus 339 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Romaine Hearts has less sugar: 1.4 g versus 4 g per 100 g.