Romaine Hearts vs Salat s kurecim masem
Overall, Romaine Hearts has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Romaine Hearts | Salat s kurecim masem |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 11 kcal | 82 kcal |
| Fat | 0.1 g | 5.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.6 g |
| Sugars | 1.4 g | 3.2 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Fiber | 1.3 g | 5 g |
| Protein | 1.2 g | 3.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Romaine Hearts has 87% fewer calories (11 kcal vs 82 kcal).
- Romaine Hearts has 98% less fat (0.1 g vs 5.7 g).
- Romaine Hearts has 83% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 0.6 g).
- Romaine Hearts has 56% less sugar (1.4 g vs 3.2 g).
- Romaine Hearts has 96% less salt (0 g vs 0.5 g).
- Salat s kurecim masem has 74% more fiber (5 g vs 1.3 g).
- Salat s kurecim masem has 66% more protein (3.5 g vs 1.2 g).
Ingredients
Romaine Hearts
Sałata
Salat s kurecim masem
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Romaine Hearts or Salat s kurecim masem?
Overall, Romaine Hearts has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Romaine Hearts has fewer calories: 11 kcal versus 82 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Romaine Hearts has less sugar: 1.4 g versus 3.2 g per 100 g.