Comparison

Romaine Hearts vs Salat s kurecim masem

Overall, Romaine Hearts has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientRomaine HeartsSalat s kurecim masem
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group — —
Calories 11 kcal 82 kcal
Fat 0.1 g 5.7 g
Saturated fat 0.1 g 0.6 g
Sugars 1.4 g 3.2 g
Salt 0 g 0.5 g
Fiber 1.3 g 5 g
Protein 1.2 g 3.5 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Romaine Hearts has 87% fewer calories (11 kcal vs 82 kcal).
  • Romaine Hearts has 98% less fat (0.1 g vs 5.7 g).
  • Romaine Hearts has 83% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 0.6 g).
  • Romaine Hearts has 56% less sugar (1.4 g vs 3.2 g).
  • Romaine Hearts has 96% less salt (0 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Salat s kurecim masem has 74% more fiber (5 g vs 1.3 g).
  • Salat s kurecim masem has 66% more protein (3.5 g vs 1.2 g).

Ingredients

Romaine Hearts

Sałata

Salat s kurecim masem

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Romaine Hearts or Salat s kurecim masem?

Overall, Romaine Hearts has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Romaine Hearts has fewer calories: 11 kcal versus 82 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Romaine Hearts has less sugar: 1.4 g versus 3.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons