Riz complet a grain long vs Riso long e wild
Overall, Riso long e wild has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Riz complet a grain long | Riso long e wild |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 343 kcal | 351 kcal |
| Fat | 2.8 g | 1.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.7 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.6 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 2.9 g | 3.4 g |
| Protein | 8 g | 9.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Riso long e wild has 50% less fat (1.4 g vs 2.8 g).
- Riso long e wild has 15% more fiber (3.4 g vs 2.9 g).
- Riso long e wild has 15% more protein (9.4 g vs 8 g).
Ingredients
Riz complet a grain long
riz complet bio à grain long parboiled *, *De production biologique étrangère. Certification bio; CH-BIO-006, bio.inspecta AG
Riso long e wild
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Riz complet a grain long or Riso long e wild?
Overall, Riso long e wild has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Riz complet a grain long has fewer calories: 343 kcal versus 351 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Riz complet a grain long has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.6 g per 100 g.