Riz sauvage vs Riz complet a grain long
Overall, Riz sauvage has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Riz sauvage | Riz complet a grain long |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 354 kcal | 343 kcal |
| Fat | 1 g | 2.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0.7 g |
| Sugars | 2.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 6.5 g | 2.9 g |
| Protein | 14 g | 8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Riz sauvage has 64% less fat (1 g vs 2.8 g).
- Riz sauvage has 71% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 0.7 g).
- Riz complet a grain long has 80% less sugar (0.5 g vs 2.5 g).
- Riz sauvage has 55% more fiber (6.5 g vs 2.9 g).
- Riz sauvage has 43% more protein (14 g vs 8 g).
- Riz sauvage has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Riz sauvage
Sser cuire 40 min à feu moyen. > complet (Zizania aquatica) biologique.
Riz complet a grain long
riz complet bio à grain long parboiled *, *De production biologique étrangère. Certification bio; CH-BIO-006, bio.inspecta AG
FAQ
Which is healthier: Riz sauvage or Riz complet a grain long?
Overall, Riz sauvage has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Riz complet a grain long has fewer calories: 343 kcal versus 354 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Riz complet a grain long has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 2.5 g per 100 g.