Wildreismix vs Riz complet a grain long
Overall, Wildreismix has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Wildreismix | Riz complet a grain long |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 334 kcal | 343 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 2.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.7 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 7 g | 2.9 g |
| Protein | 10 g | 8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Wildreismix has no fat, while Riz complet a grain long has 2.8 g.
- Wildreismix has no saturated fat, while Riz complet a grain long has 0.7 g.
- Wildreismix has no sugar, while Riz complet a grain long has 0.5 g.
- Wildreismix has 59% more fiber (7 g vs 2.9 g).
- Wildreismix has 20% more protein (10 g vs 8 g).
- Wildreismix has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Wildreismix
Long grain parboiled 85%, riz sauvage 15%. Tous les ingrédients agricoles sont issus de l'agriculture biologique.
Riz complet a grain long
riz complet bio à grain long parboiled *, *De production biologique étrangère. Certification bio; CH-BIO-006, bio.inspecta AG
FAQ
Which is healthier: Wildreismix or Riz complet a grain long?
Overall, Wildreismix has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Wildreismix has fewer calories: 334 kcal versus 343 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Wildreismix has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.