Comparison

Riz sauvage vs Riso long e wild

Overall, Riz sauvage has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientRiz sauvageRiso long e wild
Nutri-Score a b
NOVA group — —
Calories 354 kcal 351 kcal
Fat 1 g 1.4 g
Saturated fat 0.2 g 0.5 g
Sugars 2.5 g 0.6 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 6.5 g 3.4 g
Protein 14 g 9.4 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Riz sauvage has 29% less fat (1 g vs 1.4 g).
  • Riz sauvage has 60% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Riso long e wild has 76% less sugar (0.6 g vs 2.5 g).
  • Riz sauvage has 48% more fiber (6.5 g vs 3.4 g).
  • Riz sauvage has 33% more protein (14 g vs 9.4 g).
  • Riz sauvage has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Riz sauvage

Sser cuire 40 min à feu moyen. > complet (Zizania aquatica) biologique.

Riso long e wild

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Riz sauvage or Riso long e wild?

Overall, Riz sauvage has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Riso long e wild has fewer calories: 351 kcal versus 354 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Riso long e wild has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 2.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons