Riz sauvage vs Riso long e wild
Overall, Riz sauvage has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Riz sauvage | Riso long e wild |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 354 kcal | 351 kcal |
| Fat | 1 g | 1.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 2.5 g | 0.6 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 6.5 g | 3.4 g |
| Protein | 14 g | 9.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Riz sauvage has 29% less fat (1 g vs 1.4 g).
- Riz sauvage has 60% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 0.5 g).
- Riso long e wild has 76% less sugar (0.6 g vs 2.5 g).
- Riz sauvage has 48% more fiber (6.5 g vs 3.4 g).
- Riz sauvage has 33% more protein (14 g vs 9.4 g).
- Riz sauvage has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Riz sauvage
Sser cuire 40 min à feu moyen. > complet (Zizania aquatica) biologique.
Riso long e wild
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Riz sauvage or Riso long e wild?
Overall, Riz sauvage has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Riso long e wild has fewer calories: 351 kcal versus 354 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Riso long e wild has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 2.5 g per 100 g.