Pumpernickel vs Pumpernikiel
Overall, Pumpernikiel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pumpernickel | Pumpernikiel |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 199 kcal | 177 kcal |
| Fat | 2.3 g | 1.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 7.3 g | 6 g |
| Salt | 1.2 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | 8.8 g | 9.6 g |
| Protein | 5.1 g | 4.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pumpernikiel has 11% fewer calories (177 kcal vs 199 kcal).
- Pumpernikiel has 52% less fat (1.1 g vs 2.3 g).
- Pumpernikiel has 18% less sugar (6 g vs 7.3 g).
- Pumpernikiel has 32% less salt (0.8 g vs 1.2 g).
- Pumpernickel has 14% more protein (5.1 g vs 4.4 g).
- Only Pumpernikiel lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Pumpernickel
Not available.
Pumpernikiel
Rozdrobnione ziarno żytnie (60%), woda, syrop z buraków cukrowych, ekstrakt słodu jęczmiennego, sól, drożdże.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pumpernickel or Pumpernikiel?
Overall, Pumpernikiel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pumpernikiel has fewer calories: 177 kcal versus 199 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pumpernikiel has less sugar: 6 g versus 7.3 g per 100 g.