Pain Pumpernickel vs Pumpernickel
Overall, Pain Pumpernickel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pain Pumpernickel | Pumpernickel |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 188 kcal | 199 kcal |
| Fat | 1.3 g | 2.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 3.4 g | 7.3 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 1.2 g |
| Fiber | 9.8 g | 8.8 g |
| Protein | 4.6 g | 5.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pain Pumpernickel has 43% less fat (1.3 g vs 2.3 g).
- Pain Pumpernickel has 53% less sugar (3.4 g vs 7.3 g).
- Pain Pumpernickel has no salt, while Pumpernickel has 1.2 g.
- Pain Pumpernickel has 10% more fiber (9.8 g vs 8.8 g).
- Pain Pumpernickel has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Pain Pumpernickel lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Pain Pumpernickel
Seigle* complet concassé (49%), eau, levain naturel* (18%) (seigle* complet concassé, eau), sel marin, levure
Pumpernickel
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pain Pumpernickel or Pumpernickel?
Overall, Pain Pumpernickel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pain Pumpernickel has fewer calories: 188 kcal versus 199 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pain Pumpernickel has less sugar: 3.4 g versus 7.3 g per 100 g.