Pain Pumpernickel vs Pumpernikiel
Overall, Pain Pumpernickel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pain Pumpernickel | Pumpernikiel |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 188 kcal | 177 kcal |
| Fat | 1.3 g | 1.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 3.4 g | 6 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | 9.8 g | 9.6 g |
| Protein | 4.6 g | 4.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pain Pumpernickel has 43% less sugar (3.4 g vs 6 g).
- Pain Pumpernickel has no salt, while Pumpernikiel has 0.8 g.
- Pain Pumpernickel has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Pain Pumpernickel
Seigle* complet concassé (49%), eau, levain naturel* (18%) (seigle* complet concassé, eau), sel marin, levure
Pumpernikiel
Rozdrobnione ziarno żytnie (60%), woda, syrop z buraków cukrowych, ekstrakt słodu jęczmiennego, sól, drożdże.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pain Pumpernickel or Pumpernikiel?
Overall, Pain Pumpernickel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pumpernikiel has fewer calories: 177 kcal versus 188 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pain Pumpernickel has less sugar: 3.4 g versus 6 g per 100 g.