Pain Pumpernickel vs Westfälischer Pumpernickel
Overall, Pain Pumpernickel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pain Pumpernickel | Westfälischer Pumpernickel |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 188 kcal | 183 kcal |
| Fat | 1.3 g | 1.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 3.4 g | 5.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 1 g |
| Fiber | 9.8 g | 10.9 g |
| Protein | 4.6 g | 5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pain Pumpernickel has 38% less sugar (3.4 g vs 5.5 g).
- Pain Pumpernickel has no salt, while Westfälischer Pumpernickel has 1 g.
- Westfälischer Pumpernickel has 10% more fiber (10.9 g vs 9.8 g).
Ingredients
Pain Pumpernickel
Seigle* complet concassé (49%), eau, levain naturel* (18%) (seigle* complet concassé, eau), sel marin, levure
Westfälischer Pumpernickel
Roggenvollkornschrot, Wasser, Gerstensaft, Speisesalz, Zuckerrübensirup, Hefe
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pain Pumpernickel or Westfälischer Pumpernickel?
Overall, Pain Pumpernickel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Westfälischer Pumpernickel has fewer calories: 183 kcal versus 188 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pain Pumpernickel has less sugar: 3.4 g versus 5.5 g per 100 g.