Comparison

P'tits filets de maquereaux - Huile d'olive vierge extra vs Skinless and boneless mackerel fillets olive oil

Overall, Skinless and boneless mackerel fillets olive oil has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientP'tits filets de maquereaux...Skinless and boneless macker...
Nutri-Score d c
NOVA group 3 3
Calories 383 kcal 271 kcal
Fat 35 g 21.3 g
Saturated fat 6.9 g 4.1 g
Sugars 0 g 0.1 g
Salt 0.9 g 0.8 g
Fiber 0 g 0 g
Protein 17 g 19.7 g
Additives00
AllergensFishFish

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Skinless and boneless mackerel fillets olive oil has 29% fewer calories (271 kcal vs 383 kcal).
  • Skinless and boneless mackerel fillets olive oil has 39% less fat (21.3 g vs 35 g).
  • Skinless and boneless mackerel fillets olive oil has 41% less saturated fat (4.1 g vs 6.9 g).
  • Skinless and boneless mackerel fillets olive oil has 14% more protein (19.7 g vs 17 g).
  • Skinless and boneless mackerel fillets olive oil has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

P'tits filets de maquereaux - Huile d'olive vierge extra

filets de maquereaux 78%, huile d'olive vierges extra 20%, sel.

Skinless and boneless mackerel fillets olive oil

Mackerel Fillets [Fish], Olive Oil (28%), Water, Salt.

FAQ

Which is healthier: P'tits filets de maquereaux - Huile d'olive vierge extra or Skinless and boneless mackerel fillets olive oil?

Overall, Skinless and boneless mackerel fillets olive oil has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Skinless and boneless mackerel fillets olive oil has fewer calories: 271 kcal versus 383 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

P'tits filets de maquereaux - Huile d'olive vierge extra has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons