Filets de maquereaux trait d'huile d'olive vs Skinless and boneless mackerel fillets olive oil
Overall, Skinless and boneless mackerel fillets olive oil has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Filets de maquereaux trait d'huile d'olive
Skinless and boneless mackerel fillets olive oil
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Filets de maquereaux trait d... | Skinless and boneless macker... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 253 kcal | 271 kcal |
| Fat | 20 g | 21.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 4.1 g | 4.1 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.1 g |
| Salt | 0.8 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 17 g | 19.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Skinless and boneless mackerel fillets olive oil has 80% less sugar (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Filets de maquereaux trait d'huile d'olive has 100% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0 g).
- Skinless and boneless mackerel fillets olive oil has 14% more protein (19.7 g vs 17 g).
Ingredients
Filets de maquereaux trait d'huile d'olive
Filets de maquereaux (POISSONS) 87,5% (Scomber scombrus), huile d'olive vierge extra 12%, sel. Maquereaux pêchés en océan Atlantique Nord-Est.
Skinless and boneless mackerel fillets olive oil
Mackerel Fillets [Fish], Olive Oil (28%), Water, Salt.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Filets de maquereaux trait d'huile d'olive or Skinless and boneless mackerel fillets olive oil?
Overall, Skinless and boneless mackerel fillets olive oil has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Filets de maquereaux trait d'huile d'olive has fewer calories: 253 kcal versus 271 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Skinless and boneless mackerel fillets olive oil has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.