Poulpes vs Pota e Polvo em Azeite
Overall, Pota e Polvo em Azeite has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.
Poulpes
Pota e Polvo em Azeite
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Poulpes | Pota e Polvo em Azeite |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 116 kcal | 165 kcal |
| Fat | 3.5 g | 8.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.4 g | 1.3 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 2.2 g | 0.9 g |
| Fiber | 0.2 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 19 g | 22 g |
| Additives | 3 | 0 |
| Allergens | Molluscs, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites | Molluscs |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Poulpes has 30% fewer calories (116 kcal vs 165 kcal).
- Poulpes has 59% less fat (3.5 g vs 8.6 g).
- Poulpes has 69% less saturated fat (0.4 g vs 1.3 g).
- Pota e Polvo em Azeite has 60% less salt (0.9 g vs 2.2 g).
- Pota e Polvo em Azeite has 14% more protein (22 g vs 19 g).
- Pota e Polvo em Azeite has the better Nutri-Score.
- Pota e Polvo em Azeite is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Poulpes lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Poulpes
_Poulpes_ 80 % (Octopus maya pêché en FAO 31 et Octopus vulgaris pêché en FAO 34 Atlantique Centre-Est par chalut) (_mollusques_), huile de tournesol, persil, vinaigre de vin (_sulfites_), sel, fructose, acidifiant : acide lactique, antioxydant : acide ascorbique, conservateur : sorbate de potassium, arôme naturel.
Pota e Polvo em Azeite
Pota(40%), Polvo(20%), Azeite(39%), Sal.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Poulpes or Pota e Polvo em Azeite?
Overall, Pota e Polvo em Azeite has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Poulpes has fewer calories: 116 kcal versus 165 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Poulpes has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.