Comparison

Polvo em azeite vs Polpo cotto al naturale

Overall, Polpo cotto al naturale has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

Nutrient	Polvo em azeite	Polpo cotto al naturale
Nutri-Score	c	a
NOVA group	2	3
Calories	104 kcal	77 kcal
Fat	4.4 g	1.5 g
Saturated fat	2 g	0.5 g
Sugars	0 g	0 g
Salt	0.7 g	0.8 g
Fiber	0 g	0 g
Protein	16.5 g	15 g
Additives	0	0
Allergens	Molluscs	Molluscs

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

Polpo cotto al naturale has 26% fewer calories (77 kcal vs 104 kcal).
Polpo cotto al naturale has 66% less fat (1.5 g vs 4.4 g).
Polpo cotto al naturale has 75% less saturated fat (0.5 g vs 2 g).
Polpo cotto al naturale has the better Nutri-Score.
Polvo em azeite is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Polvo em azeite

Poulpe 57%, huile d'olive, sel

Polpo cotto al naturale

Polpo (molluschi) (Octopus cyanea), sale, acqua

FAQ

Which is healthier: Polvo em azeite or Polpo cotto al naturale?

Overall, Polpo cotto al naturale has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Polpo cotto al naturale has fewer calories: 77 kcal versus 104 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Polvo em azeite has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.

More comparisons

Poulpe Ail et Persil vs Polvo em azeite Poulpe Ail et Persil vs Polpo cotto al naturale Pulpoarme vs Polvo em azeite Pulpoarme vs Polpo cotto al naturale Polvo em azeite vs Oktopus-Salat Oktopus-Salat vs Polpo cotto al naturale Polvo em azeite vs Polipetti alla Luciana Polvo em azeite vs Tentacoli di polpo cotto...