Comparison
Pulpoarme vs Polpo cotto al naturale
Overall, Pulpoarme has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pulpoarme | Polpo cotto al naturale |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 49 kcal | 77 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 1.5 g |
| Saturated fat | — | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 19 g | 15 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Molluscs |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pulpoarme has 36% fewer calories (49 kcal vs 77 kcal).
- Pulpoarme has 67% less fat (0.5 g vs 1.5 g).
- Pulpoarme has 21% more protein (19 g vs 15 g).
- Only Polpo cotto al naturale lists: Molluscs.
Ingredients
Pulpoarme
Pulpo, Salz
Polpo cotto al naturale
Polpo (molluschi) (Octopus cyanea), sale, acqua
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pulpoarme or Polpo cotto al naturale?
Overall, Pulpoarme has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pulpoarme has fewer calories: 49 kcal versus 77 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pulpoarme has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.