Comparison
Pulpoarme vs Polvo em azeite
Overall, Pulpoarme has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pulpoarme | Polvo em azeite |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | 2 |
| Calories | 49 kcal | 104 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 4.4 g |
| Saturated fat | — | 2 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 0.7 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 19 g | 16.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Molluscs |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pulpoarme has 53% fewer calories (49 kcal vs 104 kcal).
- Pulpoarme has 89% less fat (0.5 g vs 4.4 g).
- Pulpoarme has 13% more protein (19 g vs 16.5 g).
- Polvo em azeite is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Polvo em azeite lists: Molluscs.
Ingredients
Pulpoarme
Pulpo, Salz
Polvo em azeite
Poulpe 57%, huile d'olive, sel
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pulpoarme or Polvo em azeite?
Overall, Pulpoarme has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pulpoarme has fewer calories: 49 kcal versus 104 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pulpoarme has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.