Comparison
Pulpoarme vs Carpaccio di polpo
Overall, Pulpoarme has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pulpoarme | Carpaccio di polpo |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | b |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 49 kcal | 95 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 1 g |
| Saturated fat | — | 0.4 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 1.4 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 1.5 g |
| Protein | 19 g | 20 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pulpoarme has 48% fewer calories (49 kcal vs 95 kcal).
- Pulpoarme has 50% less fat (0.5 g vs 1 g).
- Pulpoarme has no sugar, while Carpaccio di polpo has 1.4 g.
- Pulpoarme has 37% less salt (1 g vs 1.5 g).
Ingredients
Pulpoarme
Pulpo, Salz
Carpaccio di polpo
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pulpoarme or Carpaccio di polpo?
Overall, Pulpoarme has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pulpoarme has fewer calories: 49 kcal versus 95 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pulpoarme has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.4 g per 100 g.