Comparison
Pulpoarme vs Poulpe cuisiné à la galicienne
Overall, Pulpoarme has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pulpoarme | Poulpe cuisiné à la galicien... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 49 kcal | 141 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 7.7 g |
| Saturated fat | — | 1.1 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 1.2 g |
| Protein | 19 g | 18 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pulpoarme has 65% fewer calories (49 kcal vs 141 kcal).
- Pulpoarme has 94% less fat (0.5 g vs 7.7 g).
Ingredients
Pulpoarme
Pulpo, Salz
Poulpe cuisiné à la galicienne
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pulpoarme or Poulpe cuisiné à la galicienne?
Overall, Pulpoarme has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pulpoarme has fewer calories: 49 kcal versus 141 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pulpoarme has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Poulpe Ail et Persil vs Pulpoarme
Pulpoarme vs Oktopus-Salat
Pulpoarme vs Polvo em azeite
Pulpoarme vs Polipetti alla Luciana
Pulpoarme vs Polpo cotto al naturale
Pulpoarme vs Tentacoli di polpo cotto...
Poulpe Ail et Persil vs Poulpe cuisiné à la gali...
Oktopus-Salat vs Poulpe cuisiné à la gali...