Oktopus-Salat vs Polpo cotto al naturale
Overall, Polpo cotto al naturale has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Oktopus-Salat | Polpo cotto al naturale |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 114 kcal | 77 kcal |
| Fat | 6 g | 1.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.7 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 4.6 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 15 g | 15 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Molluscs |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Polpo cotto al naturale has 32% fewer calories (77 kcal vs 114 kcal).
- Polpo cotto al naturale has 75% less fat (1.5 g vs 6 g).
- Polpo cotto al naturale has 83% less salt (0.8 g vs 4.6 g).
- Polpo cotto al naturale has the better Nutri-Score.
- Polpo cotto al naturale is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Polpo cotto al naturale lists: Molluscs.
Ingredients
Oktopus-Salat
Oktopus (Octopus spp.) 69% Sonnenblumenöl, Oliven 11%, Weinessig Kochsalz, Fruktose, Zitronensaft, natürliche Aromen, Säureregulator: E331, Konservierungs off: E202.
Polpo cotto al naturale
Polpo (molluschi) (Octopus cyanea), sale, acqua
FAQ
Which is healthier: Oktopus-Salat or Polpo cotto al naturale?
Overall, Polpo cotto al naturale has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Polpo cotto al naturale has fewer calories: 77 kcal versus 114 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Oktopus-Salat has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.