Comparison

Oktopus-Salat vs Tentacoli di polpo cotto al naturale

Overall, Tentacoli di polpo cotto al naturale has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientOktopus-SalatTentacoli di polpo cotto al...
Nutri-Score e a
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 114 kcal 87 kcal
Fat 6 g 0.8 g
Saturated fat 0.7 g 0.3 g
Sugars 0 g 0 g
Salt 4.6 g 0.8 g
Fiber — 0.1 g
Protein 15 g 20 g
Additives20
AllergensNone listedMolluscs

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Tentacoli di polpo cotto al naturale has 24% fewer calories (87 kcal vs 114 kcal).
  • Tentacoli di polpo cotto al naturale has 87% less fat (0.8 g vs 6 g).
  • Tentacoli di polpo cotto al naturale has 57% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 0.7 g).
  • Tentacoli di polpo cotto al naturale has 82% less salt (0.8 g vs 4.6 g).
  • Tentacoli di polpo cotto al naturale has 25% more protein (20 g vs 15 g).
  • Tentacoli di polpo cotto al naturale has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Tentacoli di polpo cotto al naturale is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Tentacoli di polpo cotto al naturale lists: Molluscs.

Ingredients

Oktopus-Salat

Oktopus (Octopus spp.) 69% Sonnenblumenöl, Oliven 11%, Weinessig Kochsalz, Fruktose, Zitronensaft, natürliche Aromen, Säureregulator: E331, Konservierungs off: E202.

Tentacoli di polpo cotto al naturale

Polpo (Octopus vulgaris-mollusco), sale, alloro

FAQ

Which is healthier: Oktopus-Salat or Tentacoli di polpo cotto al naturale?

Overall, Tentacoli di polpo cotto al naturale has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Tentacoli di polpo cotto al naturale has fewer calories: 87 kcal versus 114 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Oktopus-Salat has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.

More comparisons