Polvo em azeite vs Tentacoli di polpo cotto al naturale
Overall, Tentacoli di polpo cotto al naturale has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Polvo em azeite | Tentacoli di polpo cotto al... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | a |
| NOVA group | 2 | 3 |
| Calories | 104 kcal | 87 kcal |
| Fat | 4.4 g | 0.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 2 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.7 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Protein | 16.5 g | 20 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Molluscs | Molluscs |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Tentacoli di polpo cotto al naturale has 17% fewer calories (87 kcal vs 104 kcal).
- Tentacoli di polpo cotto al naturale has 82% less fat (0.8 g vs 4.4 g).
- Tentacoli di polpo cotto al naturale has 85% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 2 g).
- Tentacoli di polpo cotto al naturale has 17% more protein (20 g vs 16.5 g).
- Tentacoli di polpo cotto al naturale has the better Nutri-Score.
- Polvo em azeite is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Polvo em azeite
Poulpe 57%, huile d'olive, sel
Tentacoli di polpo cotto al naturale
Polpo (Octopus vulgaris-mollusco), sale, alloro
FAQ
Which is healthier: Polvo em azeite or Tentacoli di polpo cotto al naturale?
Overall, Tentacoli di polpo cotto al naturale has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Tentacoli di polpo cotto al naturale has fewer calories: 87 kcal versus 104 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Polvo em azeite has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.